Wednesday, January 31, 2007
"Empowering Our Families": "The bottom line is gangs are still operating in our community". Respect Our Family. Respect innocent Children, Brothers,..
Re(1): Trustees ............aint
Posted on February 1, 2007 at 05:52:41 AM by dannoynted1
it is weird, i was talking to a pal of mine and she was pissed @ breaking down yesterday
the weather was bad...and it was at the time to pick up the kids from school.
"
she is always prompt picking up the kids, she called and informed the elementary school in the "hood" not on the posh side of town and informed them of the problem.
well the asst principal(female) informed the 7 year old she was going to call CPS and the police were going to make her go with them since her mother was not going to pick her up.
Even though the asst. principal knew, the mother called, had informed her of the circumstances by cell phone, which thank God she had.
.....But instead of help from our local CCISD "fiefdom" of overpaid administration responsible by agreement are (they not paid) and EMPLOYED for it? But yet exude the mentality(i have power and your people don't)to the extent to expunge families, supply a go of destruction which of course is done to render these folks obsolete, a goal that is explicit and impart by assuming "kin" as if they are worthless~without an "official leader" @ CCISD to answer to they have no boss. That seems to permeate from these rogue "big man syndrome sufferers"
Including leader MR vic Rothschild/billy Clark along with their new nilly "Carol Scott" ms. kilo?
i guess these people could care less about the bottom line where we are concerned ~ but only and especially their own self dealing from the bottom of the deck!(thanks molly)
"Pro Business" tells us the family's they are using n us and our kids they are not here for our children, or their education, they are here for the check and themselves in a position to help their ilk and their self proclaimed agenda labeled "Pro Business" a position available now they are in a "trusty" that has NOTHING to do with education............ Now who is empowered by control of "Pro Business" stance?
The CCISD educators or "pro business carpetbaggers"
oh by the
I for one am sick of "process" without "policy" but yet collects the money as they are "educating" but truly masquerading as educators!
oh and it is illegal to lock up a child for a "wanton selective" alleging a child, while @ school who is in violation and then decide among who of those worthy of prosecution.
so if you prosecute one child for the same "crime" why is it done selectively?
A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO......
When i informed a certain "middle school principal" that her alone was ENTRUSTED/OBLIGATED,ACCOUNTABLE AS she is responsible for what happens on her campus.....
the idiot principal had the gall to state "no ma'am"..."no ma'am"
i asked "your not
responsible"?
again i was told "no ma'am"..."no ma'am"
well i could not beleive i was sending my child to a school where the highest paid employee there and had the title of principal yet impotent...
needless to say she no longer is not in charge of being (not)responsible for any of our children's lives here nor works @CCISD!
But if the Principal ain't in charge and their boss is some crap "process" idiots who waste money on "welder leshin" colleen mchughs" to waste money acting like the money is being well spent when actually the goal is to waste our time, our money, and our kids time and their educational opportunities
i say we prosecute them for "tardies" just like they do to our children they for some reason is a fly on the wall instead of being educated but yet the district collects that check as if they were in class" talk about fraud and tampering with government documents/records!
not to mention:
1. dereliction of duty
2. facilitating tardies as a criminal act. 3. an audit ~ if they are being paid to educate and yet they charge students and parents i bet this type of contractual
the state gives their goodhair and pal's an extra incentive to double their money when they succeed in the "education of no child left behind bars via incarceration.
how many kids drop out rather than have to go through the criminalization they can look forward to thanks to the "policy and process" why are these principals getting paid?
if they can't stop a kid from being tardy or/and catch him skipping or enforce the policy of "go to class"then Heaven help..... they are useless to us if they will not enforce their well paid job as such are ultimately responsible for "policy and education" at their repective venues i guess they will for sure unable to stop a columbine either ?
"pro business" by wasting our money and time and our students for the last 2 years shows what their concentation is and it is ~not on education ~
but there is a future when you get money through standardized long term methods of incarceration
and i for one see a pattern of the same old "process" of waste that we have seen this past 2 years!
hail~they did not drop out.......technically you can not be labeled a drop out if you are locked-up!?!
I for one, am sick of the waste on the Consultants/Attorneys sitting in One Shoreline Plaza like Colleen Tandy Mchugh's and the Carol Scott's and the Bill Clark's (and his predecessor)who care about their "business" end instead of their "elected position"!
And i am being nice!
Remember the last thing the "trustees" want is a boss!
that is why they expelled all those transfer students only for the "south side schools"
and all this has happened courtesy of "trustees" they make policy.
well i am "not impressed" to borrow a phrase form that principal who ain't responsible for what happens on her campus.
these trustees need a boss and if ain't the one they want then we will gladly "substitute".
ala a "minuteman"!
except we know what our family and children mean to us....do they?
"We Know. We're from Here!"
that ad is super bowl worthy. some people have shown they don't know "We Know. We're from Here!"
but do not deserve to do business with those folks whose "word is more binding than any contract(k)"
now that's watt I'M talking 'bout!
Re(2): Trustees ............aint
Posted on February 3, 2007 at 08:36:18 AM by dannoynted1
i wonder what pro will be as "deserving of an education in "waste management" conducted by these worthless billy bob clarks who are 2 years behind a policy that is known to all us raised in Texas on that unwritten code of conduct.....
be a straight shooter and a SQUARE dealer.......
yup their ability to sell out our kids for the past 2 years while they troll for the best "pro-business contract" that will be more binding for their future in the "pro-business" newly coined "pro-business industry" needs to go bushs uck off the private sector part of their not from here "culture club" where we come from ...... no body gets a golf course for free let alone suggesting it will happen in 2 years.....
I will take "Quid Pro Quo " for a thousand Alex.......
Alex: "and it is the daily........"
can you hear me now?
or do we got to get a little louder?
Re(3): Trustees ............aint
Posted on February 3, 2007 at 09:05:38 AM by dannoynted1
AYE boy'o.......watt killa brew is your flavor?
they hard stuf or the kine that is sweet but always hurts u? or the kine that keeps u goin?
yup them irish eyes' r a smilin'
Re(3): Trustees ............aint
Posted on February 6, 2007 at 06:01:11 AM by d1
Re(2): CCISD Trustees ............ain't doing their JOB!
Posted on February 3, 2007 at 08:36:18 AM by dannoynted1
i wonder who/what pro will be as "deserving of an education in "waste management" conducted by these worthless billy bob clarks @CCISD who are 2 years behind a policy that is known to all us raised in Texas on that unwritten code of conduct.....
be a straight shooter and a SQUARE dealer.......
yup their ability to sell out our kids@ CCISD for the past 2 years while they troll for the best "pro-business contract" that will be more binding for their future in the "pro-business" newly coined "pro-business industry" wasting the needs of students to be educated and more "comity" in their use of the La Ley. Them folks need to go sushs buck off the private sector part of their maroon wearing jacket rich alumni, not those taxpaying public sector taxpayers from here. Yall private sector "culture club" brain drain all of us and think we are stupid because of where we come from ...... no body gets a golf course for free let alone suggesting it will happen in 2 years.....
I will take "Quid Pro Quo " for a thousand Alex.......
Alex: "and it is the daily........"
can you hear me now?
or do we got to get a little louder?
I guess you guys don't get it. How are we going to afford to go there if CCISD students and their education is nothing to those that are trying to steal/for free/provide a consolation gift to the private "real estate" for who Lame Duck Mark Scott was supposed to develop?
I know he is a main player in this "gift" for who? If you happen to owe on a student loan and you're fortunate enough to get the cash to try and finish up your degree, and go 'ole boy TAMU-CC still does/will not want/nor admit you enrollment.
Guess they ain't hurting for the money........nor the preferred clientèle....unless they.....
Are they planning to build a law school?
free money maker for an upscale neighborhood ? And tax exempt to boot?
The way students @ TAMU-CC/CCISD care on totally different "wavelengths"!
We ain't giving away free land when our students@ CCISD have a 1 in 7 chance of even hoping to get there.....thanks to the weeds they see(prosecuted poor "selected")as needing to be pulled,
so they have more time for their own brand of seeds.
OH AND LET US NOT 4GET A LITTLE ID BIT OF TRIVIA CONCERNING THE "INTERLIBRARY LOAN" REQUESTED @TAMUK.....FOR A CERTAIN "SERPENT IN THE GARDEN" ARTICLE. I GOT A COPY FROM THERE, COPIED IT AND TURNED OVER TO THE ATTORNEY FOR A FINDERS FEE OF 25K. I FOUND IT @ TAMUK. PAID & GAVE HIM MY ONLY COPY.
THEN WHEN I DID NOT GET PAID, I WENT BACK TO JERNIGAN LIBRARY TO GET ANOTHER COPY AND I WAS TOLD TAMUK NO LONGER CARRIED THE "HOUSTON CHRONICLE"
SO I REQUESTED AN INTERLIBRARY LOAN WHICH I WAS TOLD ANY OF TEXAS' A&M'S WOULD PROVIDE.
WELL NOT ONE A&M HAD THIS ARTICLE AND NO LONGER CARRIED THE HOUSTON CHRONICLE. THIS WAS 1996-1997.
THE ARTICLE PUBLISHED SUNDAY, JANUARY 14, 1996, BY JAMES PINKERTON WAS THE FRONT PAGE HEADLINE.
IT WAS AN EDUCATION IN THE POLITICAL/SOCIAL/ECONOMIC PARADIGM REGARDING PRIVATE/PUBLIC SECTOR.
Re(4): Trustees ............aint
Posted on February 7, 2007 at 03:43:19 AM by dannoynted1
does A&m's still "no longer carry a major newspaper?
talk about censorship.....
why only that paper?
oh and you know who you are .....your "piper has been calling for you to join him."
No comments:
Post a Comment